‘The Hunger Games’ vs. ‘Bully’ – unfair and outrageous MPAA film ratings?

by • April 2, 2012 • NewsComments (0)663

Only a few days ago did the Motion Pictures Association of America (MPAA) decide to withdraw its “R” (restricted) film rating on the new film Bully and release it without any ratings due to public protests.

According to their official site and trailer, the film Bully is aimed at discouraging bullying from our current, real life communities, a documentary that tells the stories of bullied kids and how we can prevent bullying.

The MPAA defines the “R” rating as

R — Restricted. Children Under 17 Require Accompanying Parent or Adult Guardian. An R-rated motion picture, in the view of the Rating Board, contains some adult material. An R-rated motion picture may include adult themes, adult activity, hard language, intense or persistent violence, sexually-oriented nudity, drug abuse or other elements, so that parents are counseled to take this rating very seriously. Children under 17 are not allowed to attend R-rated motion pictures unaccompanied by a parent or adult guardian. Parents are strongly urged to find out more about R-rated motion pictures in determining their suitability for their children. Generally, it is not appropriate for parents to bring their young children with them to R-rated motion pictures.

Huffington Post Canada suggests that the “R” rating resulted from the use of coarse language in the film (just two mentions of the f-word in a film deems the film a glorifying rating of “R” from the MPAA.) This means that youth who are under seventeen years of age are unable to go to a theatre and watch R-rated films without adult supervision. Sure, that makes sense. The MPAA is just trying to discourage youth from constant and inappropriate use of swear words, right?

On the other hand…

The Hunger Games, a newly released movie based on a popular teen fiction book series, was rated PG-13 – where parents are strongly cautioned against the mature content (“theme, violence, nudity, sensuality, language, adult activities or other elements”) for audiences under 13 years of age. Where scenes of young adults are viciously killing each other on purpose?

Now isn’t that odd? Unfair? Outrageous, even? Youth are being discouraged from watching a documentary film that contains real content with coarse language and violence, but are not barred from watching a fictional story where killings are present and may encourage violence even if it is fictional! So what does this say about MPAA film ratings? Are we to trust them? To depend on them?

I personally do encourage parents and guardians to judge the film for themselves, to determine whether or not it is appropriate for their children. MPAA’s ratings may be a good reference to start with, but do be aware of the validity of their judgement!


It's unbelievably amazing how writing autobiographical information can lead to a life-threatening (not to mention eye-twitching) case of writer's block! This leaves me no choice but to do so in the most uncreative way one could proceed: in lists. Although, enumerating facts is arguably the most logical route, as Sherlock Holmes may express. It, however, does not wholly illustrate my passion for visual arts, travel, and - as speculated - my tendency to live in novels of brilliance. My quiet nature could rival that of Holmes when he withdraws into his depths, but my wonderment toward metropolitan cities such as London and Paris parallels Nick Carraway's as he plunges into the world of The Great Gatsby. But enough ranting about oneself! Please enjoy our articles and do not hesitate to leave your thoughts underneath - we love to hear from you!
Pin It

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

These comments are not endorsed by Youth Are Awesome and/or Youth Central. Comments made are for discussion purposes only, and do not reflect the opinion of Youth Are Awesome and/or Youth Central.