Thursday, March 28, 2024
Youth Central Logo

YOUTH ARE AWESOME

Youth Are Awesome, commonly referred to as YAA, is a blog written by youth for youth. YAA provides the youth of Calgary a place to amplify their voices and perspectives on what is happening around them. Youth Are Awesome is a program of Youth Central.

Any views or opinions expressed on this blog belong solely to the author and do not represent those of people or organizations that the blog may be associated with, unless explicitly stated. All content is for informational purposes only.

HomeUncategorizedClimate change: commitment or contribution

Climate change: commitment or contribution

Youth activists cohere to the demands, "Stop the Corporate Capture of Climate Talks," as corporations such as General Motors, Arcelor Mittal and Emirates ironically sponsored the UN climate change conference in Warsaw, Poland.
Youth activists cohere to the demands, “Stop the Corporate Capture of Climate Talks,” as corporations such as General Motors, Arcelor Mittal and Emirates ironically sponsored the UN climate change conference in Warsaw, Poland.

This past week, the global community saw the collection of delegations at the UN climate change conference in Warsaw, Poland (click here to visit the context in more detail at CBC news). Many looked forward to the active debate of climate change and the solutions to thwart the pending issue. But then, the delegates were rife in a state of deadlock.

“Developing” nations, namely China and India, objected to the word “commitment” in the resolution as they wanted to distinguish their responsibilities from developed nations. China, coherently, was the largest contributor to global carbon emissions in 2012. Previously, China and India had referenced an article from the 1992 UN convention on climate change to argue that it was only developed nations who had to make “commitments” to hinder climate change. At this recent conference, developed nations, such as the United States, expressed their desire to eliminate this distinction or “firewall” between the obligations of developed nations and developing nations. In the end, the word “commitment” was changed to “contribution” in the edited resolution. The revised resolution also gave more liberty for developed countries—with rich economies—to feel at ease that they were not going to be held accountable for any future climatic disasters in developing worlds.

China is the largest carbon emission source in the global community.
China is the largest carbon emission source in the global community.

Sufficient decisions were made at the conference, including reducing deforestation and aiding developing nations to transition towards cleaner energy. However, at the end of the day, is this enough? A climate activist for the World Wildlife Fund, Samantha Smith criticized the outcome of the annual conference with her remarks, “Negotiators in Warsaw should have used this meeting to take a big and critical step towards global, just action on climate change. That didn’t happen.”

The terms of the conference are expected to be adopted by 2015. Whether, we regard thwarting climate change with the word “commitment” or “contribution,” climate change is among us and it is something that the whole global community must account for.

Rebecca Yang
Rebecca Yanghttp://YouthAreAwesome.com/author/becca
Technology Editor Hello World! It is quite difficult to summarize a human's character with only a few words. But here I go; I am a movie buff, a sushi fanatic, Korean, diligent, a student, an animal lover (especially dogs), a Taekwondo athlete, and amiable (within my own head) ...well I guess that was not too exhausting. I enjoy writing about everything. But more recently, I have discovered a passion to report on the best weekly finds in the realm of science. I sincerely hope many of you will stumble upon something to your pleasure, while reading my blogs.
RELATED ARTICLES

Most Popular